To the Honorable the Congress of the United States of North America The Petition of Richard Downing Jennings of the Island of St Eustatis, for himself and others his associates Subjects of their High Mightinesses the States General of the United Provinces of the low Countries Humbly sheweth That your Petitioner and his associates being desirous to furnish to these Unites States foreign Merchandizes which they then stood in need of, and which by reason of their invaded Situation could not be directly obtained without the most imminient peril formed the Design of eluding the Laws and the arms of Great Britain That for this Purpose in the Month of June 1770, they purchased a sloop or Vessel valled The Lark, then lying at the Island of St Christophers and laded her with Rum, Hardware, and other Articles useful to these States That to elude the British Laws which not only forbad to other Na- tions all trade with their Enemiees the Subjects of the said States, but also with every port of the said States, even those in their own possession, under the pain of Forfeiture and Confiscation, your Petitioner and his associates contrives to have the said Vessel and Cargo cleared at the Island of St Kitts as British Property and as bound to the Port of Philadelphia, then supposed to be in possession of the British Army, and to get a permit from William Matthew Berot - the Governor of the said Island, agree- ably to the said Laws. That the said Vessesl was also rovided with Proper Dutch papers from the said Island of St Eustatia, and in the Month of June ??? sailed from St Christophers, being really and truly bound to Egg Harbour then within the Dominion and Possesion of these States, and being really and truly consigned to Mssrs Andrew and James Caldwell Merchants of the State of Pennsylvania, then residing at Pottsgrove, whither they had fled from the City of Philadelphia when it was taken Possession of by the British Trips. That the said Vessel being on her said Voyage, and near the place of her destination, was compelled to take Shelter in the Bay of Delaware, by the appearance of some Vessels supposed to be British, and the next day after leaving the said Bay to go to Egg Harbour, and when near her said Port was taken by two armed American Vessels, which were supposed by the Captain of the said Sloop to be British, wherefore he answered when hailed agreeably to his British Papers and delivered the said papers to the Captors. That in consequence thereof and also of the Deposition of the Mariners of the said Vessel, whom from the very Nature of the said Voyage it was necessary to decieve, not withstanding the Dutch Papers aforesaid, the Original Letters and Orders of your Petitioner on board her, and the Deposition of the Mate, that of the Captain being rejected by the Judge, the said Vessel was con- demned as Lawful Prize by the Court of Admiralty of the State of New Jersey to which State she had been conducted by the said Captors. That your Petitioner therefore, entered his appeal, and his Counsel being of Opinion that sufficient Evidence was given in the said Cause together with that of the Captain which they advised him ought to have been admitted, and which in fact was afterwards admitted by the Court of appeals, your Petitioner did not ??? time to obtain further Evidence of the Property and destination of the said Vessel, as well to avoid delay which by the rapic Depeciation of the Paper Mnoey daily reduced the Value of the Sales of the said Vessel, as also by Reason of the dangers and accidents to which every transaction in partts beyond sea is significantly exposed during the Confusions of the present War. That the said Court of Appeals, nevertheless, have confirmed the Decree of the inferior Court to the utter astonishment and great loss of your petitioneer and his associates, and have, as your Petitioner is informed assigned as a Reason therefor, that there was no Necessity of obtaining British Papers in order to elude their Crusiers, for that had she been cleared out for Philadelphia from St Eustatia the Dutch Papers would have been a sufficient Protection. That the said Reason was not mentioned on the trial, either by the Court or by the Counsel for Libellants, wherefore your Petitioners Counsel had no opportunity of replying thereto That the said Reason can only have originated in a misconception of the Laws & Statutes of Great Britain, which as your Petitioner is advised, believes & pledges himself to show, do, as is above set forth absolutely prohibit all Commerce between St Eustatia, and any Part of the thirteen United States of America, under the pain of Confiscation That your Petitioner is also able to show from good Evidence the Propterty and Destination of the Vessel, as herein before set forth. Therefore, as Subjects of a neutral power, greviously injured by the said Determinations, your Petitioner on Behalf of himself & his associates most humbly prays your Sovereign Wisdom to take the premises into your mature consideration, and to direct a Suspension & Revision of the said Decree, to the End that Justice may be done according to the Laws and Rights of civilised nations, and also grant such further & other relief as shall seem meet & agreeable to Equity & good Conscience, and your Petitioner and his associates as in duty bound shall ever pray ??? Good (George?) Morris advocate for Rich Downing Jennings 10m (?) Lawes Advocate for Rich D. Jennings See also: The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-1800 ... By Maeva Marcus, James R. Perry, United States. Supreme Court p120-134